ESEC/FSE 2017

2017 11th Joint Meeting of the European Software Engineering Conference and the ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (ESEC/FSE 2017), September 4–8, 2017, Paderborn, Germany

Desktop Layout

Handling Failures
Research Papers
S3, Chair: Fabrizio Pastore
Are delayed issues harder to resolve? Revisiting cost-to-fix of defects throughout the lifecycle
Tim Menzies, William Nichols, Forrest Shull, and Lucas Layman
(North Carolina State University, USA; Software Engineering Institute, USA; Fraunhofer CESE, USA)
Publisher's Version
Preprint
Abstract: Many practitioners and academics believe in a delayed issue effect (DIE); i.e. the longer an issue lingers in the system, the more effort it requires to resolve. This belief is often used to justify major investments in new development processes that promise to retire more issues sooner. This paper tests for the delayed issue effect in 171 software projects con- ducted around the world in the period from 2006–2014. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest study yet published on this effect. We found no evidence for the delayed issue effect; i.e. the effort to resolve issues in a later phase was not consistently or substantially greater than when issues were resolved soon after their introduction. This paper documents the above study and explores reasons for this mismatch between this common rule of thumb and empirical data. In summary, DIE is not some constant across all projects. Rather, DIE might be an historical relic that occurs intermittently only in certain kinds of projects. This is a significant result since it predicts that new development processes that promise to faster retire more issues will not have a guaranteed return on investment (depending on the context where applied), and that a long-held truth in software engineering should not be considered a global truism.

Authors:


Time stamp: 2019-07-23T15:11:05+02:00