SPLASH Companion 2015 – Author Index |
Contents -
Abstracts -
Authors
|
Bak, Lars |
SPLASH Companion '15-PAN: "The Future of Programming ..."
The Future of Programming Languages and Programmers (Panel)
Steven D. Fraser, Lars Bak, Rob DeLine, Nick Feamster, Lindsey Kuper, Cristina V. Lopes, and Peng Wu (Innoxec, USA; Google, USA; Microsoft Research, USA; Princeton University, USA; Intel Labs, USA; University of California at Irvine, USA; Huawei, USA) In the beginning “programs” were patterns of bits that commanded the execution of individual machines. As machines evolved in complexity – languages evolved, starting with a variety of assembly languages and growing to encompass higher levels of abstraction. Over the years – somewhat surprisingly – programmers evolved from engineers at the pinnacle of their profession with many years of experience to individuals not yet 10 years old giving evidence that programming does not necessarily require a formal education. This panel will bring together a diverse set of industry and academic professionals to discuss the future of programming languages and programmers. @InProceedings{SPLASH Companion15p63, author = {Steven D. Fraser and Lars Bak and Rob DeLine and Nick Feamster and Lindsey Kuper and Cristina V. Lopes and Peng Wu}, title = {The Future of Programming Languages and Programmers (Panel)}, booktitle = {Proc.\ SPLASH Companion}, publisher = {ACM}, pages = {63--66}, doi = {}, year = {2015}, } |
|
DeLine, Rob |
SPLASH Companion '15-PAN: "The Future of Programming ..."
The Future of Programming Languages and Programmers (Panel)
Steven D. Fraser, Lars Bak, Rob DeLine, Nick Feamster, Lindsey Kuper, Cristina V. Lopes, and Peng Wu (Innoxec, USA; Google, USA; Microsoft Research, USA; Princeton University, USA; Intel Labs, USA; University of California at Irvine, USA; Huawei, USA) In the beginning “programs” were patterns of bits that commanded the execution of individual machines. As machines evolved in complexity – languages evolved, starting with a variety of assembly languages and growing to encompass higher levels of abstraction. Over the years – somewhat surprisingly – programmers evolved from engineers at the pinnacle of their profession with many years of experience to individuals not yet 10 years old giving evidence that programming does not necessarily require a formal education. This panel will bring together a diverse set of industry and academic professionals to discuss the future of programming languages and programmers. @InProceedings{SPLASH Companion15p63, author = {Steven D. Fraser and Lars Bak and Rob DeLine and Nick Feamster and Lindsey Kuper and Cristina V. Lopes and Peng Wu}, title = {The Future of Programming Languages and Programmers (Panel)}, booktitle = {Proc.\ SPLASH Companion}, publisher = {ACM}, pages = {63--66}, doi = {}, year = {2015}, } |
|
Feamster, Nick |
SPLASH Companion '15-PAN: "The Future of Programming ..."
The Future of Programming Languages and Programmers (Panel)
Steven D. Fraser, Lars Bak, Rob DeLine, Nick Feamster, Lindsey Kuper, Cristina V. Lopes, and Peng Wu (Innoxec, USA; Google, USA; Microsoft Research, USA; Princeton University, USA; Intel Labs, USA; University of California at Irvine, USA; Huawei, USA) In the beginning “programs” were patterns of bits that commanded the execution of individual machines. As machines evolved in complexity – languages evolved, starting with a variety of assembly languages and growing to encompass higher levels of abstraction. Over the years – somewhat surprisingly – programmers evolved from engineers at the pinnacle of their profession with many years of experience to individuals not yet 10 years old giving evidence that programming does not necessarily require a formal education. This panel will bring together a diverse set of industry and academic professionals to discuss the future of programming languages and programmers. @InProceedings{SPLASH Companion15p63, author = {Steven D. Fraser and Lars Bak and Rob DeLine and Nick Feamster and Lindsey Kuper and Cristina V. Lopes and Peng Wu}, title = {The Future of Programming Languages and Programmers (Panel)}, booktitle = {Proc.\ SPLASH Companion}, publisher = {ACM}, pages = {63--66}, doi = {}, year = {2015}, } |
|
Fraser, Steven D. |
SPLASH Companion '15-PAN: "The Future of Programming ..."
The Future of Programming Languages and Programmers (Panel)
Steven D. Fraser, Lars Bak, Rob DeLine, Nick Feamster, Lindsey Kuper, Cristina V. Lopes, and Peng Wu (Innoxec, USA; Google, USA; Microsoft Research, USA; Princeton University, USA; Intel Labs, USA; University of California at Irvine, USA; Huawei, USA) In the beginning “programs” were patterns of bits that commanded the execution of individual machines. As machines evolved in complexity – languages evolved, starting with a variety of assembly languages and growing to encompass higher levels of abstraction. Over the years – somewhat surprisingly – programmers evolved from engineers at the pinnacle of their profession with many years of experience to individuals not yet 10 years old giving evidence that programming does not necessarily require a formal education. This panel will bring together a diverse set of industry and academic professionals to discuss the future of programming languages and programmers. @InProceedings{SPLASH Companion15p63, author = {Steven D. Fraser and Lars Bak and Rob DeLine and Nick Feamster and Lindsey Kuper and Cristina V. Lopes and Peng Wu}, title = {The Future of Programming Languages and Programmers (Panel)}, booktitle = {Proc.\ SPLASH Companion}, publisher = {ACM}, pages = {63--66}, doi = {}, year = {2015}, } SPLASH Companion '15-PAN: "Software Professionalism – ..." Software Professionalism – Is it "Good Enough?" (Panel) Steven D. Fraser, Dennis Mancl, Nancy R. Mead, Mary Shaw, and Werner Wild (Innoxec, USA; Alcatel-Lucent, USA; Software Engineering Institute, USA; Carnegie Mellon University, USA; University of Innsbruck, Austria) In the 21st Century, software is the enabling innovation pillar for all of civilization’s needs – including: food supply, living space (water, waste, power, and climate) management, services (health, financial, transportation, communication) and human relations (social networking). While the professionalism inherent in implement-ing, deploying, and configuring software systems may not appear as advanced as that found in other more regulated professions such as medicine, aviation, and engineering – is it “good enough”? This panel will discuss whether we are learning effectively from our experiences with failure and human hazards. Panelists will also discuss how software professionalism can be accelerated and debate the effectiveness of proficiency certifications in fostering increased professionalism. @InProceedings{SPLASH Companion15p60, author = {Steven D. Fraser and Dennis Mancl and Nancy R. Mead and Mary Shaw and Werner Wild}, title = {Software Professionalism – Is it "Good Enough?" (Panel)}, booktitle = {Proc.\ SPLASH Companion}, publisher = {ACM}, pages = {60--62}, doi = {}, year = {2015}, } |
|
Kuper, Lindsey |
SPLASH Companion '15-PAN: "The Future of Programming ..."
The Future of Programming Languages and Programmers (Panel)
Steven D. Fraser, Lars Bak, Rob DeLine, Nick Feamster, Lindsey Kuper, Cristina V. Lopes, and Peng Wu (Innoxec, USA; Google, USA; Microsoft Research, USA; Princeton University, USA; Intel Labs, USA; University of California at Irvine, USA; Huawei, USA) In the beginning “programs” were patterns of bits that commanded the execution of individual machines. As machines evolved in complexity – languages evolved, starting with a variety of assembly languages and growing to encompass higher levels of abstraction. Over the years – somewhat surprisingly – programmers evolved from engineers at the pinnacle of their profession with many years of experience to individuals not yet 10 years old giving evidence that programming does not necessarily require a formal education. This panel will bring together a diverse set of industry and academic professionals to discuss the future of programming languages and programmers. @InProceedings{SPLASH Companion15p63, author = {Steven D. Fraser and Lars Bak and Rob DeLine and Nick Feamster and Lindsey Kuper and Cristina V. Lopes and Peng Wu}, title = {The Future of Programming Languages and Programmers (Panel)}, booktitle = {Proc.\ SPLASH Companion}, publisher = {ACM}, pages = {63--66}, doi = {}, year = {2015}, } |
|
Lopes, Cristina V. |
SPLASH Companion '15-PAN: "The Future of Programming ..."
The Future of Programming Languages and Programmers (Panel)
Steven D. Fraser, Lars Bak, Rob DeLine, Nick Feamster, Lindsey Kuper, Cristina V. Lopes, and Peng Wu (Innoxec, USA; Google, USA; Microsoft Research, USA; Princeton University, USA; Intel Labs, USA; University of California at Irvine, USA; Huawei, USA) In the beginning “programs” were patterns of bits that commanded the execution of individual machines. As machines evolved in complexity – languages evolved, starting with a variety of assembly languages and growing to encompass higher levels of abstraction. Over the years – somewhat surprisingly – programmers evolved from engineers at the pinnacle of their profession with many years of experience to individuals not yet 10 years old giving evidence that programming does not necessarily require a formal education. This panel will bring together a diverse set of industry and academic professionals to discuss the future of programming languages and programmers. @InProceedings{SPLASH Companion15p63, author = {Steven D. Fraser and Lars Bak and Rob DeLine and Nick Feamster and Lindsey Kuper and Cristina V. Lopes and Peng Wu}, title = {The Future of Programming Languages and Programmers (Panel)}, booktitle = {Proc.\ SPLASH Companion}, publisher = {ACM}, pages = {63--66}, doi = {}, year = {2015}, } |
|
Mancl, Dennis |
SPLASH Companion '15-PAN: "Software Professionalism – ..."
Software Professionalism – Is it "Good Enough?" (Panel)
Steven D. Fraser, Dennis Mancl, Nancy R. Mead, Mary Shaw, and Werner Wild (Innoxec, USA; Alcatel-Lucent, USA; Software Engineering Institute, USA; Carnegie Mellon University, USA; University of Innsbruck, Austria) In the 21st Century, software is the enabling innovation pillar for all of civilization’s needs – including: food supply, living space (water, waste, power, and climate) management, services (health, financial, transportation, communication) and human relations (social networking). While the professionalism inherent in implement-ing, deploying, and configuring software systems may not appear as advanced as that found in other more regulated professions such as medicine, aviation, and engineering – is it “good enough”? This panel will discuss whether we are learning effectively from our experiences with failure and human hazards. Panelists will also discuss how software professionalism can be accelerated and debate the effectiveness of proficiency certifications in fostering increased professionalism. @InProceedings{SPLASH Companion15p60, author = {Steven D. Fraser and Dennis Mancl and Nancy R. Mead and Mary Shaw and Werner Wild}, title = {Software Professionalism – Is it "Good Enough?" (Panel)}, booktitle = {Proc.\ SPLASH Companion}, publisher = {ACM}, pages = {60--62}, doi = {}, year = {2015}, } |
|
Mead, Nancy R. |
SPLASH Companion '15-PAN: "Software Professionalism – ..."
Software Professionalism – Is it "Good Enough?" (Panel)
Steven D. Fraser, Dennis Mancl, Nancy R. Mead, Mary Shaw, and Werner Wild (Innoxec, USA; Alcatel-Lucent, USA; Software Engineering Institute, USA; Carnegie Mellon University, USA; University of Innsbruck, Austria) In the 21st Century, software is the enabling innovation pillar for all of civilization’s needs – including: food supply, living space (water, waste, power, and climate) management, services (health, financial, transportation, communication) and human relations (social networking). While the professionalism inherent in implement-ing, deploying, and configuring software systems may not appear as advanced as that found in other more regulated professions such as medicine, aviation, and engineering – is it “good enough”? This panel will discuss whether we are learning effectively from our experiences with failure and human hazards. Panelists will also discuss how software professionalism can be accelerated and debate the effectiveness of proficiency certifications in fostering increased professionalism. @InProceedings{SPLASH Companion15p60, author = {Steven D. Fraser and Dennis Mancl and Nancy R. Mead and Mary Shaw and Werner Wild}, title = {Software Professionalism – Is it "Good Enough?" (Panel)}, booktitle = {Proc.\ SPLASH Companion}, publisher = {ACM}, pages = {60--62}, doi = {}, year = {2015}, } |
|
Shaw, Mary |
SPLASH Companion '15-PAN: "Software Professionalism – ..."
Software Professionalism – Is it "Good Enough?" (Panel)
Steven D. Fraser, Dennis Mancl, Nancy R. Mead, Mary Shaw, and Werner Wild (Innoxec, USA; Alcatel-Lucent, USA; Software Engineering Institute, USA; Carnegie Mellon University, USA; University of Innsbruck, Austria) In the 21st Century, software is the enabling innovation pillar for all of civilization’s needs – including: food supply, living space (water, waste, power, and climate) management, services (health, financial, transportation, communication) and human relations (social networking). While the professionalism inherent in implement-ing, deploying, and configuring software systems may not appear as advanced as that found in other more regulated professions such as medicine, aviation, and engineering – is it “good enough”? This panel will discuss whether we are learning effectively from our experiences with failure and human hazards. Panelists will also discuss how software professionalism can be accelerated and debate the effectiveness of proficiency certifications in fostering increased professionalism. @InProceedings{SPLASH Companion15p60, author = {Steven D. Fraser and Dennis Mancl and Nancy R. Mead and Mary Shaw and Werner Wild}, title = {Software Professionalism – Is it "Good Enough?" (Panel)}, booktitle = {Proc.\ SPLASH Companion}, publisher = {ACM}, pages = {60--62}, doi = {}, year = {2015}, } |
|
Wild, Werner |
SPLASH Companion '15-PAN: "Software Professionalism – ..."
Software Professionalism – Is it "Good Enough?" (Panel)
Steven D. Fraser, Dennis Mancl, Nancy R. Mead, Mary Shaw, and Werner Wild (Innoxec, USA; Alcatel-Lucent, USA; Software Engineering Institute, USA; Carnegie Mellon University, USA; University of Innsbruck, Austria) In the 21st Century, software is the enabling innovation pillar for all of civilization’s needs – including: food supply, living space (water, waste, power, and climate) management, services (health, financial, transportation, communication) and human relations (social networking). While the professionalism inherent in implement-ing, deploying, and configuring software systems may not appear as advanced as that found in other more regulated professions such as medicine, aviation, and engineering – is it “good enough”? This panel will discuss whether we are learning effectively from our experiences with failure and human hazards. Panelists will also discuss how software professionalism can be accelerated and debate the effectiveness of proficiency certifications in fostering increased professionalism. @InProceedings{SPLASH Companion15p60, author = {Steven D. Fraser and Dennis Mancl and Nancy R. Mead and Mary Shaw and Werner Wild}, title = {Software Professionalism – Is it "Good Enough?" (Panel)}, booktitle = {Proc.\ SPLASH Companion}, publisher = {ACM}, pages = {60--62}, doi = {}, year = {2015}, } |
|
Wu, Peng |
SPLASH Companion '15-PAN: "The Future of Programming ..."
The Future of Programming Languages and Programmers (Panel)
Steven D. Fraser, Lars Bak, Rob DeLine, Nick Feamster, Lindsey Kuper, Cristina V. Lopes, and Peng Wu (Innoxec, USA; Google, USA; Microsoft Research, USA; Princeton University, USA; Intel Labs, USA; University of California at Irvine, USA; Huawei, USA) In the beginning “programs” were patterns of bits that commanded the execution of individual machines. As machines evolved in complexity – languages evolved, starting with a variety of assembly languages and growing to encompass higher levels of abstraction. Over the years – somewhat surprisingly – programmers evolved from engineers at the pinnacle of their profession with many years of experience to individuals not yet 10 years old giving evidence that programming does not necessarily require a formal education. This panel will bring together a diverse set of industry and academic professionals to discuss the future of programming languages and programmers. @InProceedings{SPLASH Companion15p63, author = {Steven D. Fraser and Lars Bak and Rob DeLine and Nick Feamster and Lindsey Kuper and Cristina V. Lopes and Peng Wu}, title = {The Future of Programming Languages and Programmers (Panel)}, booktitle = {Proc.\ SPLASH Companion}, publisher = {ACM}, pages = {63--66}, doi = {}, year = {2015}, } |
11 authors
proc time: 0.37